RSS

Whose Property?

Sat, Jul 28, 2007

Articles, Divide and Rule

Whose Property?

By Susan Rosenthal

Private property is the bedrock of capitalism. So why would a self-proclaimed Communist country like China enshrine private property in its constitution? The answer lies in a deeper understanding of private property.

For most of human history, there was no private property. No one owned the land and its resources or the knowledge that was handed down through the generations. All these were shared.

The development of agriculture, about 10,000 years ago, changed the way people lived and related to one another. Foraging societies move continually in search of food. Planting crops requires landed settlements. Foraging societies depend on equality and reciprocity. Agriculture brought conflicts over land. Foraging provided barely enough food to survive. Agriculture provided a more reliable source of food and eventually a surplus.

Historians estimate that the collectively-produced surplus began to be claimed as private property about 6,000 years ago. Those who were delegated to manage the surplus for the community found themselves in a position to impose their will over the community. The same armed guards that were hired to protect the village from raiders could also protect the elite from villagers who challenged their power.

Class divisions

Private property divided humanity into classes: the majority who labor to produce; the minority who claim ownership of what is produced; and a small group of people in between. Over time, the form of class society has changed (feudalism, slavery, capitalism). Nevertheless, all class societies are based on private property, where the social surplus is in private hands.

Over the past two centuries, more and more resources have become private property including ideas, methods and machines. Seeds, plants, animals and even genes have been patented. Nations claim ownership of water and air space. There are even disputes over who owns the moon. Only the national debt is collectively owned.

Because most of the world’s wealth is owned or controlled by a small group of people, everyone else must scramble to survive. One in five people lives on less than one dollar a day; one billion people do not have adequate shelter; more than two billion people do not have proper sanitation; and more than one billion people lack safe drinking water.

As inequality grows, there is more pressure to return private property to common control. The capitalist State was created to prevent this from happening.

The State enforces a legal system that upholds the “right” of property owners to dictate what happens to “their” property. Police and armies are employed to protect private property, and the penal system maintains this unjust social arrangement.

Force alone is not enough to maintain class divisions, because the have-nots are far more numerous than the have-lots. To win majority consent for class divisions, paid propagandists praise the private property system and attack all critics.

Personal, common and private property

To promote loyalty to the system of private property, ordinary folks are encouraged to view their personal possessions as “private property.” In fact, private property consumes personal property. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that cities can seize and demolish people’s homes to make way for businesses and shopping malls.

Private property is very different from personal property. People have always had personal-use items (homes, clothes, toys, tools, etc.) that they keep, share or trade, and this will always be so, regardless of the type of social system. The important question is who owns the natural resources, tools and technology that people need to survive. Is it privately owned or commonly shared?

Common property is also confused with public property. Common property is not property at all, because no one owns it. It is shared or “owned in common.” In contrast, public property is private property that is owned by the State.

Because the State claims to represent all the people, State or public property is assumed to be commonly owned. It is not. Common ownership means that common people are in control. Public ownership means that State officials are in control.

State capitalism

Capitalism is assumed to be a system of private enterprise. However, capitalism can also take the form of State enterprise.

During World War II, much of the U.S. economy was taken over by the government, yet it remained capitalist. Today, both the American and Chinese States control about 30 percent of their economies. As nations develop, more of their economies are taken over by the State, directly or in joint ventures with private capital.

China’s shift from publicly-owned (State-controlled) property to privately-owned property marks a change in the form of capitalism. The same shift in the form of capitalism took place in Russia during the 1990s.

Modern capitalism is a global system that can take many forms: fascism, military dictatorship, electoral democracy, welfare state, etc. Regardless of the form it takes, capitalism is defined by the existence of private property, where social resources are owned or controlled by an elite.

The opposite of private property is socialism, or common control of society. There are no genuinely socialist societies in the world today. Not any.

Genuine socialism would abolish private property. People would continue to own personal-use items; however, no one would be allowed to own the means of survival, and thereby gain power over others.

Abolishing private property would end the class division of humanity and all of its miseries. The world would, once again, become our common responsibility, shared by all.

Be Sociable, Share!
, , , , , , , ,

This post was written by:

- who has written 155 posts on SusanRosenthal.com – Socialism is the Best Medicine.


Contact the author

2 Comments For This Post

  1. Sarah Edwards Says:

    August 10/07

    I’m sorry that more people aren’t leaving comments on these interesting pieces.

    I am reading Power and Powerlessness and I just can’t seem to grasp the difference between private property and personal property. I guess I bought the blurring you speak of.

    I’m a self-employed author. So is the work I create and the equipment I create it on private property or personal property? If so are you suggesting I should I be sharing it in common? Actually I’d love to share it with anyone who’s interested, or when I’m not using it, but I need income from my labors to live and my equipment is busy most of time because I work full-time. So what am I missing?

  2. Susan Rosenthal Says:

    August 10/07

    Sarah: Copyright is an extension of patent laws that restrict the use of ideas and methods to those who own them or can pay for their use. In a truly democratic society, there would be no patents, no copyright and no ownership of ideas or methods. All would be shared and, most important, everyone would benefit.

    Sadly, we don’t live in that kind of society. We live in a competitive, exploitive society where bosses are constantly thinking up new ways to enrich themselves at their workers’ expense. To survive, writers like you and me must protect ourselves from publishers who would steal our work to increase their profits. As a member of the National Writers Union, I oppose such exploitation.

    As long as the system of private property remains, individual sharing of goods and services will be just that. We must abolish the system of private property in order to create a truly sharing society based on the principle of “all for one and one for all.”

Leave a Reply